The committee, tasked with resolving disputes between neighbors, was called upon to mediate the situation. The committee members, comprised of residents and community leaders, listened to both sides of the story. They discussed the potential risks and benefits of keeping bees, including the potential for allergic reactions and the potential for bees to sting.

Mary Nisi, an Evanston beekeeper, was advised by the city of Evanston to move her beehive due to concerns about its proximity to a playground. The city’s recommendation was based on the potential for bees to sting children playing nearby. However, Nisi refused to comply, stating that the recommendation was merely a suggestion and not an official request.

This statement is particularly interesting because it suggests that Buckles was not entirely convinced of Nisi’s guilt, even if she had been presented with evidence. This suggests a degree of uncertainty and perhaps even a lack of strong evidence to support the accusation. Furthermore, Buckles’s statement about the beehive’s impact on the environment is noteworthy.

Paleologos told the committee that no one has been stung by any insects this year, but said the bees were still in her yard, particularly close to her pool. “While no one has been stung … It’s really stressful,” Paleologos said, requesting the committee revoke Nisi’s license. The committee declined to do so, instead reaffirming their approval of Nisi’s license unanimously, among the members present. Ald. Juan Geracaris (9th) said “I haven’t heard anything today that would change my yes vote on approving.” “It’s very clear in this email … if you move the bees it’s not going to change anything,” Ald. Devon Reid (8th) said.

Ald. Bobby Burns (5th), said he hopes next time an expert is brought in to provide a recommendation, it’s not one of “social compromise.” Under the city code, the Human Services Committee has the final say on beekeeping licenses.